A reader (thanks D.F. Manno) has pointed us to a recent editorial in the Chicago Tribune wherein the paper corrects the erroneous tale of a cholera epidemic in 1885 that was said to have killed 90,000 Chicagoans.
The paper credits the debunking to Libby Hill, an academic and author who recently wrote an article about the epidemic for the Tribune Magazine. The article is no longer on the Tribune's website. A very brief excerpt is here on the Museum of Hoaxes. More background here.
This belated correction comes at a time when Clark Hoyt, the public editor of The New York Times, has instigated a debate about what to do with errors lurking in newspaper archives. This particular error has been lurking in a variety of archives for a long time. It became, as Hill details, a powerful urban legend.
"The
saga has been retold so many times, in books, journals and over the
airwaves -- and, yes, in this newspaper -- that most Chicagoans attuned
to local history know of its gruesome details," notes the Tribune editorial. "Fact is, the story of Chicago's killer cholera epidemic is a fiction, a phony melodrama."
The editorial begins by quoting a 1995 Tribune article that retold the erroneous tale. Then it moves to share the fascinating correct material provided by Hill. It's an interesting read, and good that the paper includes itself among those fooled by the legend, even if it would be ideal to know exactly how many times the Tribune has cited the incorrect tale over the years. The number would help drive home just how entrenched the story had become.
There is also one aspect of the paper's editorial that rings a familiar note:
We could attribute
the legend's long life and frequent repetition to a decidedly
un-Chicago trait: gullibility. Ninety thousand deaths?
We'd rather, though, characterize this as a case of facts getting in the way of a good story. Less embarrassing that way.
After the Chicago Daily Tribune made its famous "Dewey Defeats Truman" error in 1948, it too ran a corrective article with a bit of a playful tone. The paper laid much blame at the feet of pollsters and their "alleged science." It concluded:
Having been bitten as badly as the next one, we hope that we have the courage to swear off these sessions with the crystal ball in the future. Divination and inspection of the entrails ought to be left to the vanished priests of ancient Rome. The science is too fallible.
It seems that, even in the face of serious error, the Tribune of past and present can't help but inject a little levity and indulge in an effort to share the blame. (Not to get too pluggy about it, but the tale of the Dewey/Truman error is retold in detail in the upcoming Regret the Error book.)
From the editorial:
...Imagine that. A cholera outbreak killed 90,000 Chicagoans -- and also
generated engineering lessons that helped build the Panama Canal. The
saga has been retold so many times, in books, journals and over the
airwaves -- and, yes, in this newspaper -- that most Chicagoans attuned
to local history know of its gruesome details.
Imagine that, indeed. Fact is, the story of Chicago's killer cholera epidemic is a fiction, a phony melodrama.
It was concocted a half-century ago to sell the public on a
Chicago-area flood control scheme that evolved into what's now called
the Deep Tunnel project.
Author Libby Hill, who teaches in the
department of geography and environmental studies at Northeastern
Illinois University, has tried valiantly to debunk the cholera
epidemic, most recently in a July 29 Tribune Magazine article titled
"The making of an urban legend."
Chicago did suffer a massive
storm on Aug. 2, 1885, and polluted river water did flood into the
lake. But a shift of winds pushed the contaminants away from the city's
water intakes. Over the next two weeks, the anticipated fouling of
drinking water didn't occur. One newspaper said winds and low
temperatures had "combined to reduce sickness and the death rate far
below the average of this season of the year. ... Chicago is very
fortunate."
But the seeds of a bogus legend had been planted.
According to Hill, a 1956 pamphlet published by what's now the
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District recounted the 1885 deluge and
added that, "Death from the terrible diseases of polluted water was one
byproduct of the storm."
And in 1976, as part of a debate in
the Tribune's pages over the then-nascent Deep Tunnel project, Sanitary
District President Nicholas J. Melas argued that the project was
needed: He recounted how the 1885 flooding "caused the deaths of 90,000
people." Three years later, Chicago Magazine reaffirmed that after the
storm, cholera and typhoid "wiped out 90,000 people."
Outbreaks
of killer diseases truly did play havoc with Chicago and its people:
stockyards runoff, water-borne sewage, spoiled food and lethal bugs
variously brought dysentery, smallpox, diphtheria, influenza and other
contagions to the city.
Chicago did not, though, suffer deaths
of Black Plague proportion in 1885. We're sure of that -- and we have
Libby Hill to thank for setting us straight...