The San Francisco Chronicle has published a lengthy correction after it apparently "mischaracterized" comments by a judge in a case against the Catholic Church. "Sensationalized" may be a better description.
A March 11 story about a
lawsuit filed against the Catholic Church in Oakland, alleging the
diocese allowed two brothers to be molested by a priest the church knew
to be a child molester, mischaracterized comments made by the judge in
the case.
Alameda County Superior Court Judge Harry Sheppard did not "rip" the actions of the church, as stated in the headline.
The story also
mischaracterized Judge Sheppard's comments when it stated: "Calling the
Catholic Church's conduct 'outrageous, oppressive and malicious,' an
East Bay judge ruled Thursday that two alleged sexual abuse victims may
seek punitive damages against the Diocese of Oakland." The judge's full
remark was: "The conduct of the church as alleged text: and I'm not
saying what's going to be proven, because I don't know what's going to
be proven text: but as alleged, the conduct is outrageous, oppressive
and malicious as alleged, and it was done with a conscious disregard
for persons that they were entrusted to protect, being children."
The story further
mischaracterized Judge Sheppard's comments when it stated: " 'The
church knew Father Ponciroli was a serial sexual predator, but it
allowed him to supervise and counsel these youngsters,' the judge said.
'They deliberately hid a violating priest for their own benefit.' " In
those comments, the judge was paraphrasing the allegations of the
plaintiffs, having prefaced the comment by saying that "the gist of
(the plaintiffs') complaint is that ..."
In his ruling, the judge
did not make any findings of fact, but merely ruled on the sufficiency
of the allegations to state a legal claim. Those allegations have yet
to be proven.